Crypto PACs spent $24 million on Ohio Senate race in September
Millions in crypto PAC funding shift to Ohio Senate
Crypto-related political action committees (PACs) have deployed significant funds in the 2026 Ohio Senate race. The PACs support Republican incumbent Jon Husted and oppose Democratic candidate Sherrod Brown.
In September, the Super PAC Defend American Jobs spent approximately $24 million in the race. This spending was funded primarily by a transfer from Fairshake, a Super PAC often supported by the crypto industry.
Key numbers in the race
- Defend American Jobs transferred over $24 million from Fairshake in September.
- $18.6 million was spent supporting Jon Husted.
- $5.7 million was spent opposing Sherrod Brown.
- The total cycle spending by Defend American Jobs in Ohio has exceeded $46 million.
- The Digital Freedom Fund spent an additional $5.9 million in the race, most of which came from the Winklevoss Capital Fund.
Candidate stances and political context
Sherrod Brown has publicly opposed the crypto industry. In previous statements, he described crypto assets as speculative products run by reckless companies that put Americans' money at risk.
Jon Husted is a supporter of the Clarity Act, legislation aimed at creating rules for cryptocurrency and protecting consumers. Husted stated in August 2026 that the industry needs to pass the Clarity Act to strengthen America's leadership in digital assets.
What is confirmed
Financial disclosures show that Defend American Jobs and Digital Freedom Fund have spent millions of dollars in the Ohio Senate race. The spending is split between supporting Husted and opposing Brown. Defend American Jobs continues to spend in October, including opposing independent candidate Dan Osborn in the Nebraska race.
Why it matters for crypto policy
The election in Ohio is a key battleground for cryptocurrency regulation. The amount of money flowing into the race from crypto-adjacent funds signals that the industry is actively shaping political outcomes. The Clarity Act, which would set rules for digital assets, is a central issue, with proponents arguing it protects consumers while opponents like Brown argue it is unnecessary for speculative products.