Staked Ether Should Be the Benchmark for the Decentralized Economy, Opinion Argues

Staked ether as crypto's benchmark

An opinion column published by CoinDesk argues that staked ether should be treated as the benchmark, or standard yardstick, for the decentralized crypto economy. Staked ether is ether (ETH), the second-largest cryptocurrency, locked into the Ethereum network to help secure it, with holders earning yield in return.

The column was written by Ryan Haczynski of GlobalStake. It is an opinion piece, not a news report, and the views are the author's own.

Why the author makes the case

Haczynski says crypto has grown from a speculative market into an economic system with many yield products, including staking, re-staking, lending markets, stablecoin rewards, and managed strategies. He argues these products are not interchangeable because they use different infrastructure, returns, and risks.

In his view, every financial system needs a benchmark so investors can price risk, value cash flows, and build portfolios. For the decentralized economy, he says, the yield from staked ether can serve that role.

He contrasts staked ether with dollar-backed stablecoins, crypto tokens pegged to the U.S. dollar. Stablecoin returns are tied to Federal Reserve policy, while staking rewards are linked to activity on the network itself, he argues.

Key numbers in the column

• CoinDesk's Composite Ether Staking Rate (CESR) shows staked ether offering an average yield of 2.75% per year, according to the column.
• The author calculates that a closed-end token fund would need to outperform ether by more than 31% over 10 years to make the added risk worthwhile.
• On Aave, a major DeFi (decentralized finance) lending protocol, liquid staked ether tokens make up two-thirds of the collateral behind half of the protocol's debt, the column says.
• At Spark, the lending arm of Sky, liquid staked ether collateral outweighs plain ether by fifteen to one, according to the author.
• The column adds that Spark holds so little wrapped bitcoin that it does not rank among the token's fifty largest holders.

How staked ether differs from bonds

The author acknowledges staked ether is not like government bonds. Ether is volatile, while sovereign bonds in stable countries behave almost like cash. Staked ether can also be reduced, or "slashed," if validators act maliciously or suffer serious operational failures, though the author says professional staking services and distributed validator technology reduce that risk.

He also lists advantages: Ethereum cannot default on staked ether because investors are locking assets into the protocol rather than lending them, and there is no central authority that can run out of money. Governments can default on debt. How ether is issued and destroyed is transparent, and anyone can audit it, unlike politically driven money printing, he argues.

Reported data and the author's claim

The numbers in the column are cited by the author: the CESR average of 2.75%, the 31% outperformance calculation, and the Aave and Spark collateral data. They are presented as reported figures from the named sources.

The central claim, that staked ether should be the benchmark of the decentralized economy, is the author's opinion and is not a confirmed market fact.

Why the argument matters

If the author's view is accepted, staked ether would give investors a standard for comparing onchain investments. Crypto firms and tokens would be in constant competition with staked ether, needing to show they can generate better returns. Investors could treat staked ether as a base layer and add higher-risk yield only when it meaningfully outperforms, the column says.

Sources

• CoinDesk

Read also: Zama opens 16 confidential Morpho vaults and launches private swaps on Ethereum